BOWLES, John ‹ LBT 30835 ›: Difference between revisions

From London Book Trades
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pybot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Pybot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:


<!-- 30835 LBT30835 30835 Jan Jean Joan Joane John John A John E John H John W Johnny Jon Jona Jone Jonny Bailes BALES BALLES BALLS BAYLES BAYLIS Beales BEALS BELLOWES Biles BLEASE BOLAS BOLES BOULES Bowles Boyles BYLES Powles -->{{#set: Sex=M | LBTNum=30835 | birth date= | death date= }}{{#set: firstname=John | lastname=BOWLES }}{{FloruitTimeLine|start=1709|end=1709}}
<!-- 30835 LBT30835 30835 Jan Jean Joan Joane John John A John E John H John W Johnny Jon Jona Jone Jonny Bailes BALES BALLES BALLS BAYLES BAYLIS Beales BEALS BELLOWES Biles BLEASE BOLAS BOLES BOULES Bowles Boyles BYLES Powles -->{{#set: Sex=M | LBTNum=30835 | birth date= | death date= }}{{#set: firstname=John | lastname=BOWLES }}{{FloruitTimeLine|start=1709|end=1709}}{{#set: floruitstart=1709 | floruitend=1709}}
<span id="flline">''&nbsp;[[How Floruit is Calculated | floruit]] 1709 <span title="From professional records in the database">(A)</span>&mdash;1709 <span title="From professional records in the database">(A)</span>; &nbsp;Male ''</span>__NOTOC__
<span id="flline">''&nbsp;[[How Floruit is Calculated | floruit]] 1709 <span title="From professional records in the database">(A)</span>&mdash;1709 <span title="From professional records in the database">(A)</span>; &nbsp;Male ''</span>__NOTOC__
== Occupations (1) ==
== Occupations (1) ==

Latest revision as of 23:18, 12 April 2026

14501940
15001600170018001900
Floruit: 1709

  floruit 1709 (A)—1709 (A);  Male

Occupations (1)

Occupation Comment
Print seller Plomer, H.R. &c. (1922)

Addresses (2)

Date Address Trade at Addr Source Comment
1709, (1709) Cornhill, - Black Horse Plomer, H.R. &c. (1922)
1709, (1709) Strand, over against Devereux Court, without Temple Bar Plomer, H.R. &c. (1922)


MLT Note: Plomer, H.R. &c. (1922) list a John and Thomas Bowles appearing on a map of 1709. Thomas is more likely to be the first Thomas Bowles (LBT/02666) rather than the second, who was not freed until 1711; and the John could hardly be the younger Thomas's brother who would only have been about eight at the time. O.D.N.B. and Tyacke do not mention an earlier John.